Berkshire Hathaway and Fidelity are intent on not seeing the connection between their investments and the genocide in Darfur
While Sudan's oil revenue has been providing arms and funding for the genocide in Darfur, Berkshire Hathaway and Fidelity became the largest US investors in PetroChina. Berkshire Hathaway continues to be largest investor.
- Fidelity has recently reduced itsholdings, but is still a very large investor.
- Click here for information on Fidelity's SEC filing on May 15, 2007, and the attendant press coverage showing that our combined voices can have an impact.
- Click here for our most current view of Fidelity's holdings of PetroChina and Sinopec.
PetroChina's closely related parent, CNPC, is Sudan's largest partner in the oil industry there. We hold PetroChina accountable, just as we would CNPC, since the "separation between these two companies is largely cosmetic" and they "should not be rewarded" for creating distinctions on paper to obscure their connections to the genocide. Read more about China's Problem Oil Companies in Sudan. (Quotations from the Yale ACIR report.)
Berkshire Hathaway, by virtue of its very large holdings in PetroChina, is especially well positioned to play an important role in helping to end the genocide. Berkshire Hathaway can either strenuously and publicly engage PetroChina to effect a change in the behavior of the government of Sudan or divest. However, instead of taking decisive action, Berkshire Hathaway has advanced weak rationalizations in an attempt to justify its investments and distance themselves from involvement in this first genocide of the 21st century.
Berkshire Hathaway's position
Berkshire Hathaway issued a statement on February 21 claiming that divestment advocates are “wrong” about the relevance of their PetroChina holdings to the genocide. Berkshire makes several self-serving claims, each of which is incorrect, and in the process misses the central moral factor that is evident and has already been voiced by thousands -- Americans do not want their savings invested in companies that are helping to fund the genocide in Darfur.
Fidelity's position
In the face of the genocide and citizen complaints, Fidelity has remained unmoved, saying their only job is to make money and the genocide is someone else's problem.
- Fidelity letter of October 5, 2006
- Fidelity statement to CNN Money, published January 29, 2007Take action and object to Fidelity and Berkshire Hathaway
Berkshire Hathaway and Sudan